A systematic review of studies on dementia and social networking found that individuals in better cognitive health tend to have larger and more integrated networks of social contacts. Those with more extensive social networks were more likely to demonstrate cognitive resilience and less likely to develop dementia. The paper was published in Neuroscience.
Dementia is a condition marked by a significant decline in cognitive abilities that interferes with daily life. There are different types of dementia, but the most common is Alzheimer’s disease. People with dementia typically experience memory loss, particularly for recent events, while older memories often remain clearer for longer. They also tend to have difficulty with language, problem-solving, and reasoning. Changes in mood, personality, and behavior are common as the condition progresses.
Dementia results from damage to brain cells, which disrupts communication between them. Although it occurs more frequently in older adults, it is not considered a normal part of aging. Some types of dementia are caused by treatable conditions such as vitamin deficiencies or thyroid problems and can be reversed if detected early. However, most types are progressive and incurable, so treatment focuses on symptom management, slowing cognitive decline, and supporting both patients and caregivers.
Study author Faheem Arshad and his colleagues aimed to integrate findings from studies examining the relationship between social networking and dementia. Previous research has suggested that social networking—defined as the recognition and maintenance of meaningful social connections—may offer protection against cognitive decline. In other words, individuals with richer social networks were less likely to develop dementia. Components of these networks include marital status, the number of people one is in contact with, the frequency of those interactions, satisfaction with those relationships, and perceived support.
The authors analyzed the results of 17 studies published between 2000 and 2024. The mean age of participants ranged from 40 to 90 years. Six studies were conducted in the United States, three in Germany, two in the United Kingdom, and one each in China, France, Sweden, Ireland, Iceland, and India. Thirteen of the studies included follow-up periods ranging from one to fifteen years. In total, the review synthesized data from 20,678 participants.
The studies consistently reported that individuals with poorer social networks were more likely to develop dementia. In contrast, those with larger and more integrated social networks were less likely to be diagnosed with dementia during the follow-up periods.
Four longitudinal studies examined how qualities of social networks at a baseline time point were associated with cognitive decline or dementia onset over time. These studies found higher rates of cognitive decline among participants with smaller or less integrated networks. Some studies also reported that individuals with better social networks tended to show healthier brain structures over time. This was especially evident in the amygdala, a brain region involved in emotion and social behavior, which appeared to be better preserved in those with more robust social networks.
“Our systematic review suggests a strong association between poor SN [social networking] and increased risk of dementia and cognitive decline, especially in AD [Alzheimer’s disease] patients. Hence, larger, more integrated social networks contribute to cognitive resilience and reduced disease severity,” the study authors concluded.
The study contributes to the scientific knowledge about dementia. However, it should be noted that the design of the studies included in this analysis does not allow any definitive causal inferences to be derived. While it is possible that good social networks protect from dementia, it is also possible that people in better cognitive health are better able to maintain social contacts producing the observed associations.
The paper, “Association between social networking and dementia: A systematic review of observational studies,” was authored by Faheem Arshad, Deenadayalan Boopalan, Sonali Arora, Howard J. Rosen, and Suvarna Alladi.
