New research suggests that the distinctive cognitive traits associated with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, or ADHD, may provide a specific advantage in how people tackle creative challenges. A study conducted by psychologists found that individuals reporting high levels of ADHD symptoms are more likely to solve problems through sudden bursts of insight rather than through methodical analysis.
These findings indicate that while ADHD is often defined by its deficits, the condition may also facilitate a unique style of thinking that bypasses conscious logic to reach a solution. The results were published in the journal Personality and Individual Differences.
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder is a neurodevelopmental condition typically characterized by difficulty maintaining focus, impulsive behavior, and hyperactivity. These symptoms are often viewed through the lens of executive function deficits. Executive function refers to the brain’s management system. It acts like an air traffic controller that directs attention, filters out distractions, and keeps mental processes organized.
When this system works efficiently, a person can focus on a specific task and block out irrelevant information. However, researchers have long hypothesized that a “leaky” attention filter might have a hidden upside. If the brain does not filter out irrelevant information efficiently, it may allow remote ideas and associations to enter conscious awareness. This broader associative net could theoretically help a person connect seemingly unrelated concepts.
To test this theory, a team of researchers led by Hannah Maisano and Christine Chesebrough, along with senior author John Kounios, designed an experiment to measure problem-solving styles. Maisano is a doctoral student at Drexel University, and Chesebrough is a researcher at the Feinstein Institutes for Biomedical Research. They collaborated with Fengqing Zhang and Brian Daly of Drexel University and Mark Beeman of Northwestern University.
The researchers recruited 299 undergraduate students to participate in an online study. The team did not limit the study to individuals with a formal medical diagnosis. Instead, they asked all participants to complete the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale. This is a standard survey used to measure the frequency and severity of symptoms such as inattention and hyperactivity. This approach allowed the scientists to examine the effects of these traits across a full spectrum of severity.
The core of the experiment involved a test known as the Compound Remote Associates task. Psychologists frequently use this task to measure convergent thinking, which is the ability to find a single correct answer to a problem. In this test, participants view three words that appear unrelated. Their goal is to find a fourth word that creates a familiar compound word or phrase with each of the three.
For example, a participant might see the words “pine,” “crab,” and “sauce.” The correct answer is “apple,” which forms “pineapple,” “crabapple,” and “applesauce.” The participants attempted to solve sixty of these puzzles.
After each successful solution, the participants reported how they arrived at the answer. They had to choose between two distinct cognitive styles. The first style is analysis. This involves a deliberate, step-by-step search for the answer. It is a conscious and slow process. The second style is insight. This is often described as an “Aha!” moment. It occurs when the solution pops into awareness suddenly and surprisingly, often after the person has stopped actively trying to force a result.
The data revealed a distinct pattern in how different groups approached the puzzles. Participants who reported the highest levels of ADHD symptoms relied heavily on insight. They were statistically significantly more likely to solve the problems through sudden realization than through step-by-step logic.
In contrast, the participants with the lowest levels of ADHD symptoms displayed a different profile. This group used a balance of both insight and analysis to find the answers. They did not favor one method overwhelmingly over the other.
“We found that individuals reporting the strongest ADHD symptoms relied significantly more on insight to solve problems,” said Maisano. “They appear to favor unconscious, associative processing that can produce sudden creative breakthroughs.”
The researchers also analyzed the total number of problems solved correctly by each group. This analysis produced an unexpected U-shaped curve. The group with the highest symptoms and the group with the lowest symptoms both performed very well. They solved the most puzzles overall. However, the participants in the middle of the spectrum performed the worst.
This U-shaped result suggests that high and low levels of executive control lead to success through different routes. People with high executive control can effectively use analytical strategies. They can systematically test words until they find a match. People with low executive control, such as those with high ADHD symptoms, struggle with that systematic approach. However, their tendency toward unfocused thought allows their brains to stumble upon the answer unconsciously.
The individuals in the middle appear to be at a disadvantage in this specific context. They may not have enough executive control to be highly effective at analysis. Simultaneously, they may have too much control to allow their minds to wander freely enough for frequent insight.
Kounios explains the implication of this finding. “Our results show that having strong ADHD symptoms can mean being a better creative problem-solver than most people, that is, than people who have low to moderate ADHD symptoms.”
The study aligns with the concept of dual-process theories of thought. Psychologists often distinguish between Type 1 and Type 2 processing. Type 1 processing is fast, automatic, and unconscious. It is the engine behind intuitive insight. Type 2 processing is slow, effortful, and conscious. It drives analytical reasoning.
ADHD symptoms are generally associated with a weakness in Type 2 processing. The effort required to maintain focus and manipulate information in working memory is often impaired. The researchers argue that this deficit in Type 2 processing forces—or perhaps allows—individuals with ADHD symptoms to rely on Type 1 processing.
This reliance on Type 1 processing is not merely a compensation strategy. It appears to be a robust pathway to solution in its own right. The high-symptom group did not just fail to analyze; they succeeded through insight. The regression analyses performed by the team showed that as ADHD symptoms increased, the probability of using analysis dropped, while the probability of using insight rose.
“Being both very high or very low in executive control can be beneficial for creative problem-solving, but you get to the right answer in different ways,” said Chesebrough.
Kounios and his colleagues emphasize that these findings challenge the traditional view of ADHD as purely a disorder of deficits. While the condition certainly presents challenges in environments that require rigid focus and organization, it offers advantages in situations that demand creative connections.
The study does have limitations. It relied on a sample of university students rather than a broader slice of the general population. Additionally, the study used self-reported symptoms rather than clinical diagnoses confirmed by a physician. It is possible that other undiagnosed conditions could have influenced the results.
The researchers also note that they excluded participants who reported poor sleep or substance use, as these factors can impair cognitive performance. Future research will need to replicate these findings with larger groups and formally diagnosed clinical populations to confirm the robustness of the U-shaped performance curve.
Despite these caveats, the research offers a new perspective on neurodiversity in the context of problem-solving. It suggests that the cognitive profile associated with ADHD is not simply a broken version of “normal” cognition. Instead, it represents a different functional organization of the brain. This organization favors spontaneous processing over deliberate control.
Understanding this strength could help educators and employers create environments that harness the natural abilities of individuals with ADHD. Rather than forcing these individuals to adopt analytical strategies that do not fit their cognitive style, it may be more effective to encourage their intuitive approaches.
“Understanding these strengths could help people harness their natural problem-solving style in school, work and everyday life,” said Kounios.
The study, “ADHD symptom magnitude predicts creative problem-solving performance and insight versus analysis solving modes,” was authored by Hannah Maisano, Christine Chesebrough, Fengqing Zhang, Brian Daly, Mark Beeman, and John Kounios.
Leave a comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.